[protege-discussion] Windows XP64 install bug

[David States]

Thanks, I will give it a try.  XP64 is a bit of an odd ball OS.  Most 
apps are really XP32 running in compatability mode.  Even has two 
distinct and non-interoperating ODBC frameworks :(

David

Jennifer Vendetti wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Sorry to hear that you are having a problem with the installer.  The 
> installer is working fine on 32-bit XP systems, but unfortunately, I 
> don't have a 64-bit system to test with.  I would recommend the following:
>
> 1).  Upgrade to the latest Protege 3.4 beta build [1].  We are not that 
> far away from releasing this version and it has many important bug fixes 
> that have been integrated since the 3.3.1 release.
>
> 2).  If you still have problems with an empty Program Group, you can fix 
> this manually in the Windows Explorer under C:\Documents and 
> Settings\<your-user-name>\Start Menu\Programs.  Here, you can edit the 
> Protege Program Group to have the name that you want, and you can make 
> sure that the correct shortcut to the Protege application is present.  
> Steps for doing this sort of thing are described in detail on 
> Microsoft's website [2].
>
> Jennifer
>
> [1] http://protege.stanford.edu/download/registered.html#p34b
> [2] 
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/personalize/startmenu.mspx#2
>
>
> David J. States wrote:
>   
>> Installing Protege 3.31 on Windows XP64, everything works except that I 
>> get "Task menu => All Program => Protege 3.31 => (empty)".  If I 
>> navigate to c:\Program Files (x86)\Protege_3.3.1 I can launch the 
>> application by double clicking on protege.exe and everything seems to 
>> work.  Maybe somewhere an incorrrect assumption is being made about 
>> c:\Program Files vs. c:\Program Files(x86)?
>>
>> David
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20080804/28dc7499/attachment.html>