Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Protege-frames or Protege-OWL
Safran, Tracy (NIH/NCI) [C]
safrant at mail.nih.gov
Thu Aug 14 13:58:31 PDT 2008
Have you looked at the NCI Enterprise Vocabulary Services? We provide
API access to the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus. That might work
Tracy M. Safran
From: M. jack [mailto:mall_bidon at hotmail.fr]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:05 AM
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Subject: [protege-discussion] Protege-frames or Protege-OWL
I have to do a medical ontology concerning cancer. At the begining, I
using Protege 4.0 alpha, because I thought it was the last version, and
therefore the best one. But, now I am asking question to myself given
the ontology has to be used by an other application, and with
4.0 I have the impression that it is not possible.
In fact, there will be some image processing first, to find every
histological characteristics on images related to cancer, and then the
ontology will deliver a diagnosis. It means that the pre-work done by
image processing will be used by the ontology in other words protege to
a diagnosis. Is it possible with protege 4.0 alpha? With any protege-OWL
editor? Or with a Protege-Frames editor?
I am not even sure that an ontology can be used like that. Maybe there
something that I don't understand at all with ontologies and with
Thank you very much for the help.
View this message in context:
Sent from the Protege - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Instructions for unsubscribing:
More information about the protege-discussion