Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Protege-frames or Protege-OWL
swt at stanford.edu
Thu Aug 14 15:52:43 PDT 2008
Both Protege 3.x  and Protege 4  have APIs that you can use in
OWL is a possible reasoner if you can formulate your diagnosis as a
Safran, Tracy (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
> Have you looked at the NCI Enterprise Vocabulary Services? We provide
> API access to the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus. That might work
> for you.
> Tracy M. Safran
> SAIC Contractor
> EVS Support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. jack [mailto:mall_bidon at hotmail.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:05 AM
> To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Subject: [protege-discussion] Protege-frames or Protege-OWL
> I have to do a medical ontology concerning cancer. At the begining, I
> using Protege 4.0 alpha, because I thought it was the last version, and
> therefore the best one. But, now I am asking question to myself given
> the ontology has to be used by an other application, and with
> 4.0 I have the impression that it is not possible.
> In fact, there will be some image processing first, to find every
> histological characteristics on images related to cancer, and then the
> ontology will deliver a diagnosis. It means that the pre-work done by
> image processing will be used by the ontology in other words protege to
> a diagnosis. Is it possible with protege 4.0 alpha? With any protege-OWL
> editor? Or with a Protege-Frames editor?
> I am not even sure that an ontology can be used like that. Maybe there
> something that I don't understand at all with ontologies and with
> Thank you very much for the help.
More information about the protege-discussion