Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] Re: user access for projects in protege server
swt at stanford.edu
Tue Dec 2 12:40:16 PST 2008
I know that Protege developers are working hard to make 3.4 release "soon."
Aside from that, I'd say Protege 3.3.1 is not necessarily more stable
than the current Protege 3.4 beta. Remember that version 3.3.1 receives
no bug fixes since it was released.
Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On the point about using a recent Protege version, could you give me an
> idea of when 3.4 might become a GA rather than a Beta release?
> I, for one, am using 3.3.1 because 3.4 is still labelled as Beta and
> want the most stable platform for my application.
> Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
> Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
> On 2 Dec 2008, at 17:29, Samson Tu wrote:
>> You need to use a recent Protege 3.x beta. The Read and
>> DisplayInProjectList policies were not enforced until fairly recently,
>> and certainly not in Protege 3.3.1.
>> Joachim Kleb wrote:
>>> Hi Tania,
>>> thanks for your prompt reply.
>>> I am using Protege 3.3.1. The client is running on Windows and the
>>> Server on a debian linux shell.
More information about the protege-discussion