Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] Re: user access for projects in protege server

Jonathan Carter jonathan.carter at e-asolutions.com
Tue Dec 2 13:01:20 PST 2008


Thanks Samson,

Makes sense. I'll download 3.4 and have a go.

Regards

Jonathan
_______________________________________
Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
__________________________________________

On 2 Dec 2008, at 20:40, Samson Tu wrote:

>
> I know that Protege developers are working hard to make 3.4 release  
> "soon."
>
> Aside from that, I'd say Protege 3.3.1 is not necessarily more stable
> than the current Protege 3.4 beta. Remember that version 3.3.1  
> receives
> no bug fixes since it was released.
>
> Samson
>
> Jonathan Carter wrote:
>> On the point about using a recent Protege version, could you give  
>> me an
>> idea of when 3.4 might become a GA rather than a Beta release?
>> I, for one, am using 3.3.1 because 3.4 is still labelled as Beta and
>> want the most stable platform for my application.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>>
>> Jonathan
>> __________________________________________
>> Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
>> Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>> __________________________________________
>> __________________________________________
>>
>> On 2 Dec 2008, at 17:29, Samson Tu wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You need to use a recent Protege 3.x beta. The Read and
>>> DisplayInProjectList policies were not enforced until fairly  
>>> recently,
>>> and certainly not in Protege 3.3.1.
>>>
>>> Samson
>>>
>>> Joachim Kleb wrote:
>>>> Hi Tania,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your prompt reply.
>>>> I am using Protege 3.3.1. The client is running on Windows and the
>>>> Server on a debian linux shell.
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20081202/e20c1a84/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list