Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] Re: user access for projects in protege server
jonathan.carter at e-asolutions.com
Tue Dec 2 13:01:20 PST 2008
Makes sense. I'll download 3.4 and have a go.
Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
On 2 Dec 2008, at 20:40, Samson Tu wrote:
> I know that Protege developers are working hard to make 3.4 release
> Aside from that, I'd say Protege 3.3.1 is not necessarily more stable
> than the current Protege 3.4 beta. Remember that version 3.3.1
> no bug fixes since it was released.
> Jonathan Carter wrote:
>> On the point about using a recent Protege version, could you give
>> me an
>> idea of when 3.4 might become a GA rather than a Beta release?
>> I, for one, am using 3.3.1 because 3.4 is still labelled as Beta and
>> want the most stable platform for my application.
>> Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
>> Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>> On 2 Dec 2008, at 17:29, Samson Tu wrote:
>>> You need to use a recent Protege 3.x beta. The Read and
>>> DisplayInProjectList policies were not enforced until fairly
>>> and certainly not in Protege 3.3.1.
>>> Joachim Kleb wrote:
>>>> Hi Tania,
>>>> thanks for your prompt reply.
>>>> I am using Protege 3.3.1. The client is running on Windows and the
>>>> Server on a debian linux shell.
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-discussion