Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] 3.3.1: Generated Protege-OWL Code have duplicated Functions]
Tania Tudorache
tudorache at stanford.edu
Fri Jul 18 18:17:08 PDT 2008
I did not understand exactly what you did. You mentioned only Protege
3.3.1... You may want to try out the generator in Protege 3.4 beta that
contains several bug fixes and enhancements.
Please ask in future protege-owl related questions on the protege-owl
mailing list. This list is only for protege-frames related questions.
Thanks,
Tania
Wing Kuen LEE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use Protege 3.3.1 to open the project that I have created in Protege
> 3.1.1, and generate Protege-OWL java code again (create with abstract
> base files). Some of the generated classes named imp/*_.java (i.e.
> implementation class with underscore) have duplicated functions:
>
> public Collection getPartOfEnumeratedClass()
> public RDFProperty getPartOfEnumeratedClassProperty()
> public boolean hasPartOfEnumeratedClass()
> public Iterator listPartOfEnumeratedClass()
> public void addPartOfEnumeratedClass(Object newPartOfEnumeratedClass)
> public void removePartOfEnumeratedClass(Object oldPartOfEnumeratedClass)
> public void setPartOfEnumeratedClass(Collection
> newPartOfEnumeratedClass)
>
> I then try to generate Protege-OWL code with Protege 3.1.1 from a
> project created in Protege 3.3.1. The generated source codes have no
> problem.
>
> It is cumbersome to remove duplicated functions when number of classes
> are large.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
More information about the protege-discussion
mailing list