Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] correct ontology

Tania Tudorache tudorache at stanford.edu
Mon Jul 21 17:47:01 PDT 2008


Norman,

There is a W3C Semantic Web best practices group that described how to 
model "rich" relationships (a.k.a reifed relationships). I think this 
will help you with the modeling:

http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/

Tania


Noman Hasany wrote:
>
> Plz Consider the sentence:
>
>  
>
> _Virtual office_ has a product _VOIP Phone_ in _Germany_ with price 
> _200 Euro_.
>
>  
>
> In the above case, the product price is related to Country, means we 
> cannot store the triple:
>
> *VOIPhone hasPrice 200Euro*
>
> because "Price" is country dependant
>
> so what will be the hierarchy and appropriate tuples to be stored in RDF?
>
> --- On *Fri, 7/18/08, Tania Tudorache /<tudorache at stanford.edu>/* wrote:
>
>     From: Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu>
>     Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] waht is the exact equivalent
>     term for the" Subject, predicate and object" in OWL
>     To: "User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor"
>     <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>     Date: Friday, July 18, 2008, 6:05 PM
>
>     Please ask protege-owl related questions on the protege-owl mailing 
>     list. This list is used only for the protege-frames related questions.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Tania
>
>     fateme abdoli wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi
>     >
>     >  
>     >
>     > I had problem :
>     >
>     > I want to query my ontology in jena farmework,  I want to know waht is 
>     > the exact equivalent  term for the" Subject, predicate and
>     object" in 
>     > OWL ontology that was designed in protege.
>     >
>     >
>     > Send instant messages to your online friends 
>     > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>     > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > protege-discussion mailing list
>     > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>     >
>     > Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>     >   
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     protege-discussion mailing list
>     protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>     Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>   




More information about the protege-discussion mailing list