Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Simple and nooby question about inference in Protegé

Nick Drummond nick.drummond at
Tue Mar 25 10:12:19 PDT 2008


Yes, I was just confused when you said about the SWRL tab as this  
doesn't exist for Protege4.x.
No problem, if you are just trying some examples to test the tools - I  
didn't mean to patronize :)

I'd better leave it up to the experts to check the SWRL.


On 25 Mar 2008, at 15:03, Matteo Montalto wrote:

> Nick Drummond ha detto: in data 25/03/2008 15.26:
>> Matteo,
>> Its not clear which version of Protege you are using for running your
>> rules.
> Hello Nick and thanks for your help,
> maybe you didn't see that, I wrote anyway I'm using protege 4.0, build
> 58... Can you please tell me what's the right mailing list to ask for
> help with that version?
>> You should post any Protege3.x OWL/SWRL questions in the protege-owl
>> list [1]
>> Or Protege4.x questions in the protege4.0feedback list [2].
> Uhm... but the list for feedback is intended also to get help in such
> questions? :)
>> I'm no SWRL expert, but it seems you could get your expected  
>> behaviour
>> by just using equivalent classes in OWL.
>> Parent  = Person and (hasChild some Thing)
> of course Nick, I just forgot to explain that my attempt was just an
> example to use some owl:restriction construct into swrl rules. I'm
> working on a project for my thesis, using the jena framework, and my  
> use
> of Protege is limited to some ontology I build ad hoc to test some  
> cases.
> This was the case in which an swrl rule contains an owl:restriction;  
> but
> neither Protege nor my Jena project tell me that trivial assertion,
> which is that Stephanie is a Parent.
> So I guess there's something wrong but cannot find what's the point :)
> Thanks again :)
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at
> Instructions for unsubscribing:

More information about the protege-discussion mailing list