[protege-discussion] Problem using Forms Tab in Collaborative mode

[Jonathan Carter]

This is expected behaviour and it intentional on the basis that a  
"superuser" or "admin" can control the forms by directly accessing the  
Project in stand-alone mode to manage the GUI. Having many users  
attempting to edit the forms at once could cause all sorts of  
problems, I would imagine.
For what I'm doing, this works ideally. I can modify the forms as I  
need to then start up the server to have my users work on Classes and  
Instances in multi-user mode and I can control the GUI and make sure  
that it's consistent. Although I realise that it would convenient to  
be able to edit the Forms from client-server mode, I would have a lot  
of concerns about how the Forms would or could turn out if they were  
available to all users.

Hope this helps

Jonathan
__________________________________________
Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
__________________________________________

Assess your EA maturity at:
www.enterprise-architecture.com/EAvaluator
__________________________________________

On 25 May 2008, at 01:26, Tomas Potok wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I'm running the Protege server (tried 3.3.1 and 3.4beta) and
> I cannot turn the "FormsTab" in "Project / Configure..." on
> (when connected to the server remotely). There's even no reason for  
> tab
> unavailability displayed (for others there's one). Simply greyed
> out.
>
> Windows XP, standard out-of-the-box setup.
>
> Help greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tomas
>
> --
> Also doing mathematics this way?
> http://kopernik.cc.fmph.uniba.sk/~potok/jokes/math.jpg
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20080527/ee82b515/attachment.html>