Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] FW: frame_based ontologies' format
Jones, Josette F.
jofjones at iupui.edu
Thu Apr 23 05:29:38 PDT 2009
Sorry I missed it
-----Original Message-----
From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu [mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Tania Tudorache
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:08 PM
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] FW: frame_based ontologies' format
Josette,
I've posted a reply to that message sending the correct URL:
http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/view.php/the_knowledge_model_of_protege_2000__combining_interoperability_and_flexibility
Tania
Jones, Josette F. wrote:
> Sorry the document can't be accessed HTTP 400 ERROR
> Any suggestions
> Have a gentle day!
> Josette
> Josette Jones, RN, PhD
> Assistant Professor School of Informatics and School of Nursing
> Indiana University, Indianapolis
> 535 Michigan Avenue
> Room 491
> Indianapolis, IN 46202
> Phone: (317) 274-8059
> Fax: (317) 278-7669
> Email: jofjones at iupui.edu
> Webpage: http://informatics.iupui.edu/people/jofjones
>
>
>
> From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
> [mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
> Tania Tudorache
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 6:01 PM
> To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
> Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] frame_based ontologies' format
>
> Protege frames uses a subset of OKBC as its knowledge model. If you read
>
> this paper you will get all the details:
>
> http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/Knowledge_Model/protege-knowled
> ge-model.html
>
> The default serialization is CLIPS format (However, Protege doesn't use
> CLIPS in any other way). Other serializations are the XML format [1] and
>
> the database backend [2].
>
> Tania
>
> [1]: http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/index.php/XMLBackend
> [2]: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/design/jdbc_backend.html - the
> documentation is a bit outdated
>
> me 2 wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>> what's the format of frame_based ontologies?
>> (because owl format is for owl ontologies, I ask it)
>> I'm going to work with frame_based ones.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> New Email addresses available on Yahoo!
>>
>>
> <http://sg.rd.yahoo.com/aa/mail/domainchoice/mail/signature/*http://mail
> .promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/>
>
>> Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and
>>
> @rocketmail.
>
>> Hurry before someone else does!
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-discussion
mailing list