[protege-discussion] Plz Help compatible issue

[Timothy Redmond]

This question would be better suited for the protege owl mailing list  
[1].  I think that what you have done is to use Protege 4 to save your  
ontology in the OWL/XML format.  Protege 3.4 does not support this owl  
format and will not be able to read the resulting file.  If you save  
the file in the RDF/XML format in Protege 4 then Protege 3.4 will be  
able to read the file.

-Timothy


[1] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl

On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Shyam Durrai wrote:

> Hi There,
>
> I'm trying to compare xml of one application tool with the XML of  
> the ontology of the same application in eclipse. The ontology is  
> made in protege4.0 The comparison is done using OWL-API and Jars.  
> ( The initial comparison worked ok which was done in protege 3.3.1.  
> When I made the ontology in Protege4.0, I'm stuck, I get these errors.
>
>
>
>    Jena parse error message: {E201} Multiple children of property  
> element -- com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.arp.impl.XMLHandler$1: {E201}  
> Multiple children of property element
>
>
> "The resource @_:A201 has the rdf:type http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl2-xml#ObjectProperty 
>  which is not a class but a  
> edu.stanford.smi.protegex.owl.model.impl.DefaultRDFUntypedResource
> Suggestion: In many cases the problem is a missing owl:imports  
> statement to the classes file which defines the correct type of http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl2-xml#ObjectProperty
> Data taken from Festo Test Rig Line Components: CCE XML"
>
> Can anybody help plz.
>
> In my code I do:
>
> OWLModel owlModel = ProtegeOWL.createJenaOWLModelFromURI(uri);
>
> the uri is the location of the ontology, is it possible to create a  
> jenamodel in prodege 4?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shyam
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03