[protege-discussion] Protege fails to open project on linux

[Tania Tudorache]

Hi David,

Thanks a lot for sending the file. It is an OWL file that is accompanied 
by the wrong pprj file.

The pprj file indicates that you are using the RDF Backend (RDF files), 
but you actually have an OWL file and it should be opened with the OWL 
backend.

You can open directly the OWL file and save. This will generate a new 
pprj file that you can open next time. If you don't make any form 
configuration, then you can work directly with the OWL file rather than 
the pprj file in future.

If you have Protege-OWL related questions, please post them in future on 
the protege-owl mailing list:

http://protege.stanford.edu/community/lists.html

Thanks,
Tania


Tania Tudorache wrote:
> Sorry, you're talking about a frames project :)
>
> I suspect this is a problem with the paths in the pprj file. Can you 
> send the project files to take a look at them?
>
> You can also recreate the pprj file from the pins and pons, if you 
> create a new file and enable the option "Create from existing sources" 
> in the New project wizard.
>
> It is quite strange that you do not get any messages in the console. 
> Can you please post the messages you see in the Protege console?
>
> Tania
>
>
> Tania Tudorache wrote:
>> Instead of opening the pprj file, open the owl file directly.
>>
>> If you still have problems, please send the owl and pprj files.
>>
>> Tania
>>
>> David Forslund wrote:
>>> I've created a project in Protege 3.4.1 on Windows/XP & Vista and 
>>> saved the project.  When I open the project on linux (RH and 
>>> OpenSuse) with Protege 3.4.1, I get a window titled "Load Project 
>>> Errors" with the errors listed.  java.lang.NullPointerException and 
>>> Fatal error. execution stopped.  It says to see console and log for 
>>> more details.  But the logs and console show now errors.  I've 
>>> switched JVMs on linux with no changes.  Both are using Java 1.6.    
>>> I'm not sure how to identify and correct the problem.  The project 
>>> file looks fine.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Dave Forslund
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>>
>>> Instructions for unsubscribing: 
>>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: 
>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: 
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>