[protege-discussion] populate ontology automatically

[awatif Mubarak]

Hello, 

 

I am not expert in Ontology building, could you please tell me How can I draw the ontology graph 

with thanks

 

Regards, 

Awatef
 
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:17:18 -0800
> From: csongor.nyulas at stanford.edu
> To: yuddish_191086 at yahoo.com; protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] populate ontology automatically
> 
> Hi Ravi,
> 
> The easiest way, I think, would be to write a little bit of Java code 
> and use the Protege-OWL API [1]. Please check out also the Programmers 
> Guide [2]. In case your instances would come from a database you could 
> use readily available Protege plug-ins like DataMaster [3].
> 
> [1] http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/
> [2] http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/guide.html
> [3] http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/index.php/DataMaster
> 
> Csongor
> 
> Yuddish Ravi wrote:
> > hi,
> > can you please tell how can i retrieve instances online and 
> > populate my ontology automatically?
> > 
> > thnks
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > protege-discussion mailing list
> > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> >
> > Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> 
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 

_________________________________________________________________
More than messages–check out the rest of the Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090226/82cedaeb/attachment.html>