Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] protege-discussion Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3

hhuang hui-min.huang at nist.gov
Thu Jun 4 11:14:24 PDT 2009


I would like to request to be removed from this maling list.

Thanks

Hui Huang

At 04:22 PM 6/2/2009, you wrote:
>Send protege-discussion mailing list submissions to
>         protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>         protege-discussion-owner at lists.stanford.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of protege-discussion digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: some questions about using psmtab in  protege3.1 (??)
>    2. Re: Sample Populated Protege Frames Ontologies    for Testing
>       Purposes ? (Ron Schultz)
>    3. Re: Post install issue (Kiefer, Richard C. (Rick) II)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:36:02 +0800
>From: ?? <cqhardrocker at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] some questions about using psmtab in
>         protege3.1
>To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
>         <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>Message-ID:
>         <2aa02a9c0906020236u1c38d180w890f784eff245632 at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
>Dear Samson:
>             I have built a prototype ontology of my domain:monitoring and
>diagnosis. I also built some SWRL rule of reasoning about the judgement and
>selection of the diagnosis algorithm. but i see it's hard to build my
>diagnosis algorithm with SWRL rule, for example the artificial neural
>network. how can i integrate the algorithm into it. can you help me and
>maybe give me some advice? and i want to build some agent framework of
>finishing the system work--monitoring and diagnosis. i read that
>jessagenttab is a good tool of integrating the agent template building with
>jess. but i follow the link in the plugin library listed and just can't get
>through, how can i get it any where else? and i see there's an application
>name jadejessprotege.jar, what the use is that? thank you very much.
>
>
>ChangQi
>
>2009/4/17 Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu>
>
> >
> > ontology+ P&R psm is feasible for some problems as shown by published
> > description of the experiments. However, without access to the existing
> > P & R PSM code, you have to implement the PSM yourself. The alternative
> > would be to develop your applications directly using rules or procedural
> > code. Which is better depends entirely on your goals and the extent to
> > which P&R fits your application problem.
> >
> > Samson
> >
> > ?? wrote:
> > > Samson:
> > >           Thank you of patiently helping me. The former problem have
> > > been solved after I add all the 5 Jars in the run_protege_psm.sh file.
> > > Yes, I realized the problem that you mentioned. But how can I get the
> > > jess code of the psms? From your vision, the ontology+psm in protege is
> > > whether feasible or should I adopt another way like ontology+swrl+jess
> > > in protege. The reason I want the psm way is seemed convenient to me.
> > > Maybe there is some misunderstanding. Can you give me an advice so that
> > > I can take few time wondering and build my own KBS quickly.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chang Qi
> > >
> > >
> > > 2009/4/16 Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu <mailto:swt at stanford.edu>>
> >  >
> > >     ?? wrote:
> > >      > Samson:
> > >      >              I am just a newcomer of protege. To my understand,
> > >     P&R PSM
> > >      > is a reasoning structure that have been built for solving
> > >     problems coded
> > >      > in upml. PSM can be reused in another domain with PSM and ontology
> > >      > mapping.
> > >
> > >     Yes.
> > >
> > >     I read that PSMtab can configure to mapping PSM and ontology I
> > >      > built.
> > >
> > >     Yes.
> > >
> > >     ...I read in some papers that they use PSMtab building
> > >      > the task structure and reasoning in jess. is this a working way?
> > >
> > >     The problem is that I don't think the P& R Jess code is included in
> > the
> > >     PSM configuration tab. Unless other Protege developers know where the
> > P
> > >     &R Jess code is, I don't see how the P&R PSM configuration would
> > >     help you.
> > >
> > >     Samson
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > protege-discussion mailing list
> > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> >
> > Instructions for unsubscribing:
> > http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
> >
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/565ac16d/attachment-0001.htm 
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:07:02 -0500
>From: "Ron Schultz" <rcaschultz at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Sample Populated Protege Frames
>         Ontologies      for Testing Purposes ?
>To: "'User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor'"
>         <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>Message-ID: <009401c9e3a4$8d2d0790$a78716b0$@com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Thanks Jonathan. This will really help. Besides, this gives me an excuse to
>look at your EA toolset J
>
>
>
>From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
>[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan
>Carter
>Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 8:08 AM
>To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Sample Populated Protege Frames Ontologies
>for Testing Purposes ?
>
>
>
>Hi Ron,
>
>
>
>I have an ontology with over 1300 instances in that you can use - it's a
>fairly small project but covers around 300+ classes.
>
>
>
>Download it from
>http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/community/share-extensions?func=selec
>t
><<http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/community/share-extensions?func=sele>http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/community/share-extensions?func=sele
>ct&id=4> &id=4
>
>
>
>Let me know if you have any issues (the project does refer to a custom slot
>widget that hasn't been tested with Web Protege but that may not affect your
>performance testing).
>
>
>
>Regards
>
>
>
>Jonathan
>
>_______________________________________
>
>Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
>Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>_______________________________________
>
>
>
>Proud sponsors of The Essential Project.
>The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform
>  <http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/> www.enterprise-architecture.org
>_______________________________________
>
>
>
>On 29 May 2009, at 06:04, Ron Schultz wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>I am testing some Web Prot?g? extensions I have been working on and I am now
>requiring some more diversity in my test data. Is there available anywhere
>some .PONT/.PINS/.PPRJ files for some ontologies containing hundreds if not
>thousands of instances that are openly available? I do not really care about
>content as I am testing the usability and performance of these extensions
>and I would like to avoid having to create these ontologies personally.
>
>I would much appreciated any references or pointers.
>
>Ron Schultz
>
>_______________________________________________
>protege-discussion mailing list
>protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>Instructions for unsubscribing:
>http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/688a4134/attachment-0001.htm 
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:22:04 -0500
>From: "Kiefer, Richard C. (Rick) II" <Kiefer.Richard at mayo.edu>
>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Post install issue
>To: "User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor"
>         <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>,
>         <protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu>
>Message-ID:
>         <81B7A83BDFBC10439733E9BA89676439030F7981 at msgebe14.mfad.mfroot.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hello,
>
>I am also running into this error.  Any suggestions to resolve the 
>issue would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thank you
>Rick
>
>________________________________
>
>From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu 
>[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of 
>Singh, Hardeep 1. (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
>Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 6:54 AM
>To: protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
>Subject: [protege-discussion] Post install issue
>Importance: High
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I have installed Prot?g? 3.4 with webprotege alpha 0.5. I followed 
>every step in the manual but still not able to get this going.
>
>
>
>Please see the attached screen shot and the error log for the same
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Thanks and Regards
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Hardeep Singh
>
>Solution Architect | COO OBS - SMPC | Nokia Siemens Networks
>
>Office: +91 80 40551589 | Cell: +919632219654 | Internal: 8581589
>
>
>
>P Please don't print this email unless absolutely necessary
>
>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/1ddde96b/attachment.htm 
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: not available
>Type: image/jpeg
>Size: 100894 bytes
>Desc: image001.jpg
>Url : 
>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/1ddde96b/attachment.jpeg 
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: not available
>Type: image/jpeg
>Size: 1700 bytes
>Desc: image002.jpg
>Url : 
>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/1ddde96b/attachment-0001.jpeg 
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>protege-discussion mailing list
>protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>
>End of protege-discussion Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3
>*************************************************

Hui-Min Huang
Intelligent Systems Division
Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology

100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8230
Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Phone:  301 975 3427
Fax:      301 990 9688
email:    hui-min.huang at nist.gov
URL:      http://www.isd.mel.nist.gov/personnel/huang/

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/VVV
All opinions expressed herein are my own and are not NIST official
statements.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/VVV 




More information about the protege-discussion mailing list