Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Searching for Post Doc Position in Ontology Engineering

Daramola Wande dwande at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 02:26:41 PDT 2009


Dear All,
Please pardon me if this seem not to be most appropiate medium for job
seeking.  Doesanyone have information to share with me on vacant post
doctoral position in the area of ontology engineering and development.
 I have good grounding in semantic web technologies, Knowledge
Representation with OWL / RDF, and Semantically Enabled Software
Architecture. I also have tangible experience working  using the
Protege tool. I am a fresh Ph.D from Nigeria. My resume can be found
at: http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/Image:ICBO_CV.doc
Thanks.
Daramola JO

On 6/4/09, hhuang <hui-min.huang at nist.gov> wrote:
> I would like to request to be removed from this maling list.
>
> Thanks
>
> Hui Huang
>
> At 04:22 PM 6/2/2009, you wrote:
>>Send protege-discussion mailing list submissions to
>>         protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu
>>
>>You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         protege-discussion-owner at lists.stanford.edu
>>
>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>than "Re: Contents of protege-discussion digest..."
>>
>>
>>Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: some questions about using psmtab in  protege3.1 (??)
>>    2. Re: Sample Populated Protege Frames Ontologies    for Testing
>>       Purposes ? (Ron Schultz)
>>    3. Re: Post install issue (Kiefer, Richard C. (Rick) II)
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 1
>>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:36:02 +0800
>>From: ?? <cqhardrocker at gmail.com>
>>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] some questions about using psmtab in
>>         protege3.1
>>To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
>>         <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>>Message-ID:
>>         <2aa02a9c0906020236u1c38d180w890f784eff245632 at mail.gmail.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>>
>>Dear Samson:
>>             I have built a prototype ontology of my domain:monitoring and
>>diagnosis. I also built some SWRL rule of reasoning about the judgement and
>>selection of the diagnosis algorithm. but i see it's hard to build my
>>diagnosis algorithm with SWRL rule, for example the artificial neural
>>network. how can i integrate the algorithm into it. can you help me and
>>maybe give me some advice? and i want to build some agent framework of
>>finishing the system work--monitoring and diagnosis. i read that
>>jessagenttab is a good tool of integrating the agent template building with
>>jess. but i follow the link in the plugin library listed and just can't get
>>through, how can i get it any where else? and i see there's an application
>>name jadejessprotege.jar, what the use is that? thank you very much.
>>
>>
>>ChangQi
>>
>>2009/4/17 Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu>
>>
>> >
>> > ontology+ P&R psm is feasible for some problems as shown by published
>> > description of the experiments. However, without access to the existing
>> > P & R PSM code, you have to implement the PSM yourself. The alternative
>> > would be to develop your applications directly using rules or procedural
>> > code. Which is better depends entirely on your goals and the extent to
>> > which P&R fits your application problem.
>> >
>> > Samson
>> >
>> > ?? wrote:
>> > > Samson:
>> > >           Thank you of patiently helping me. The former problem have
>> > > been solved after I add all the 5 Jars in the run_protege_psm.sh file.
>> > > Yes, I realized the problem that you mentioned. But how can I get the
>> > > jess code of the psms? From your vision, the ontology+psm in protege
>> > > is
>> > > whether feasible or should I adopt another way like ontology+swrl+jess
>> > > in protege. The reason I want the psm way is seemed convenient to me.
>> > > Maybe there is some misunderstanding. Can you give me an advice so
>> > > that
>> > > I can take few time wondering and build my own KBS quickly.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Chang Qi
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2009/4/16 Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu <mailto:swt at stanford.edu>>
>> >  >
>> > >     ?? wrote:
>> > >      > Samson:
>> > >      >              I am just a newcomer of protege. To my understand,
>> > >     P&R PSM
>> > >      > is a reasoning structure that have been built for solving
>> > >     problems coded
>> > >      > in upml. PSM can be reused in another domain with PSM and
>> > > ontology
>> > >      > mapping.
>> > >
>> > >     Yes.
>> > >
>> > >     I read that PSMtab can configure to mapping PSM and ontology I
>> > >      > built.
>> > >
>> > >     Yes.
>> > >
>> > >     ...I read in some papers that they use PSMtab building
>> > >      > the task structure and reasoning in jess. is this a working
>> > > way?
>> > >
>> > >     The problem is that I don't think the P& R Jess code is included
>> > > in
>> > the
>> > >     PSM configuration tab. Unless other Protege developers know where
>> > > the
>> > P
>> > >     &R Jess code is, I don't see how the P&R PSM configuration would
>> > >     help you.
>> > >
>> > >     Samson
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > protege-discussion mailing list
>> > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>> >
>> > Instructions for unsubscribing:
>> > http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>> >
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>URL:
>>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/565ac16d/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 2
>>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:07:02 -0500
>>From: "Ron Schultz" <rcaschultz at gmail.com>
>>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Sample Populated Protege Frames
>>         Ontologies      for Testing Purposes ?
>>To: "'User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor'"
>>         <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>>Message-ID: <009401c9e3a4$8d2d0790$a78716b0$@com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>Thanks Jonathan. This will really help. Besides, this gives me an excuse to
>>look at your EA toolset J
>>
>>
>>
>>From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
>>[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
>> Jonathan
>>Carter
>>Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 8:08 AM
>>To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
>>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Sample Populated Protege Frames
>> Ontologies
>>for Testing Purposes ?
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Ron,
>>
>>
>>
>>I have an ontology with over 1300 instances in that you can use - it's a
>>fairly small project but covers around 300+ classes.
>>
>>
>>
>>Download it from
>>http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/community/share-extensions?func=selec
>>t
>><<http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/community/share-extensions?func=sele>http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/community/share-extensions?func=sele
>>ct&id=4> &id=4
>>
>>
>>
>>Let me know if you have any issues (the project does refer to a custom slot
>>widget that hasn't been tested with Web Protege but that may not affect
>> your
>>performance testing).
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>Jonathan
>>
>>_______________________________________
>>
>>Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
>>Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>>_______________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>Proud sponsors of The Essential Project.
>>The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform
>>  <http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/> www.enterprise-architecture.org
>>_______________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>On 29 May 2009, at 06:04, Ron Schultz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I am testing some Web Prot?g? extensions I have been working on and I am
>> now
>>requiring some more diversity in my test data. Is there available anywhere
>>some .PONT/.PINS/.PPRJ files for some ontologies containing hundreds if not
>>thousands of instances that are openly available? I do not really care
>> about
>>content as I am testing the usability and performance of these extensions
>>and I would like to avoid having to create these ontologies personally.
>>
>>I would much appreciated any references or pointers.
>>
>>Ron Schultz
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>protege-discussion mailing list
>>protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>>Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>URL:
>>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/688a4134/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 3
>>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:22:04 -0500
>>From: "Kiefer, Richard C. (Rick) II" <Kiefer.Richard at mayo.edu>
>>Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Post install issue
>>To: "User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor"
>>         <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>,
>>         <protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu>
>>Message-ID:
>>
>> <81B7A83BDFBC10439733E9BA89676439030F7981 at msgebe14.mfad.mfroot.org>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I am also running into this error.  Any suggestions to resolve the
>>issue would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>Thank you
>>Rick
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
>>[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
>>Singh, Hardeep 1. (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
>>Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 6:54 AM
>>To: protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
>>Subject: [protege-discussion] Post install issue
>>Importance: High
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>>I have installed Prot?g? 3.4 with webprotege alpha 0.5. I followed
>>every step in the manual but still not able to get this going.
>>
>>
>>
>>Please see the attached screen shot and the error log for the same
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks and Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Hardeep Singh
>>
>>Solution Architect | COO OBS - SMPC | Nokia Siemens Networks
>>
>>Office: +91 80 40551589 | Cell: +919632219654 | Internal: 8581589
>>
>>
>>
>>P Please don't print this email unless absolutely necessary
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>URL:
>>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/1ddde96b/attachment.htm
>>
>>
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>Name: not available
>>Type: image/jpeg
>>Size: 100894 bytes
>>Desc: image001.jpg
>>Url :
>>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/1ddde96b/attachment.jpeg
>>
>>
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>Name: not available
>>Type: image/jpeg
>>Size: 1700 bytes
>>Desc: image002.jpg
>>Url :
>>http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090602/1ddde96b/attachment-0001.jpeg
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>protege-discussion mailing list
>>protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>>
>>End of protege-discussion Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3
>>*************************************************
>
> Hui-Min Huang
> Intelligent Systems Division
> Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory
> National Institute of Standards and Technology
>
> 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8230
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899
>
> Phone:  301 975 3427
> Fax:      301 990 9688
> email:    hui-min.huang at nist.gov
> URL:      http://www.isd.mel.nist.gov/personnel/huang/
>
> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/VVV
> All opinions expressed herein are my own and are not NIST official
> statements.
> \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/VVV
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>



More information about the protege-discussion mailing list