Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Re : protege-discussion Digest, Vol 33, Issue 30

siham amrouch sihamamrouch at yahoo.fr
Fri May 1 05:54:25 PDT 2009


Dear all,
Can we create a duplicate class in protege 3.4 beta
thnx

--- En date de : Mer 29.4.09, protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu <protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu> a écrit :
De: protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu <protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu>
Objet: protege-discussion Digest, Vol 33, Issue 30
À: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Date: Mercredi 29 Avril 2009, 18h51

Send protege-discussion mailing list submissions to
	protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	protege-discussion-request at lists.stanford.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	protege-discussion-owner at lists.stanford.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of protege-discussion digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Protege Build 533 Server Problem (list user)
   2. Re: Protege Build 533 Server Problem (Tania Tudorache)
   3. Re: Protege Output not validated by	other	validators
      (Tania Tudorache)
   4. Protege Reporting (Ron Schultz)
   5. Re: Protege Reporting (Jonathan Carter)
   6. svn problem (Aaron Kaplan)
   7. Re: svn problem (Jennifer Vendetti)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:13:17 -0400
From: list user <quasilister at gmail.com>
Subject: [protege-discussion] Protege Build 533 Server Problem
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Message-ID:
	<5bec3dcf0904281613i4e740f52k538979de6e8e71a9 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear All,   I recently installed Protege 3.4 (build 533) on machine running
ubuntu and I seem to be having some problems with the server.  Previously, I
had Protege build 519 installed and everything worked nicely.  Now for some
reason, I can only load collaborativeNewspaper on a remote machine using the
protege client.  I have tried colloborativePizza, a new RDF/OWL project, a
new Frames project and nothing seems to work on the remote machines.

I can connect to the server and I see a listing for all the projects,
however, after selecting anything but collaborativeNewspaper, nothing
appears on the protege client.  When trying to connect with a windows
machine I receive many <Unkown Source> errors that people have said are
related to null pointers.

On the server side, I can see that a new connection is made.  The server is
up and running right now if you care to give it a try: cellbo.dyndns.org

Thank you,
Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090428/376a61f0/attachment-0001.htm


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:32:03 -0700
From: Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Protege Build 533 Server Problem
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
	<protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <49F791F3.20303 at stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Benjamin,

I just connected to your Protege server and loaded Collaborative Pizza 
without any problems :)

Is it possible that the remote client has only the Frame version of 
Protege installed? That would explain it. Or, is it possible that the 
client has a different version of Protege?

In any case, your server works fine. The problem seems to be the client. 
Can you send us the exceptions you get in the client console?

Tania



list user wrote:
> Dear All,
>    I recently installed Protege 3.4 (build 533) on machine running 
> ubuntu and I seem to be having some problems with the server. 
>  Previously, I had Protege build 519 installed and everything worked 
> nicely.  Now for some reason, I can only load collaborativeNewspaper 
> on a remote machine using the protege client.  I have tried 
> colloborativePizza, a new RDF/OWL project, a new Frames project and 
> nothing seems to work on the remote machines.  
>
> I can connect to the server and I see a listing for all the projects, 
> however, after selecting anything but collaborativeNewspaper, nothing 
> appears on the protege client.  When trying to connect with a windows 
> machine I receive many <Unkown Source> errors that people have said 
> are related to null pointers. 
>
> On the server side, I can see that a new connection is made.  The 
> server is up and running right now if you care to give it a try: 
> cellbo.dyndns.org <http://cellbo.dyndns.org>
>
> Thank you,
> Benjamin
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>   



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:18:58 -0700
From: Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Protege Output not validated by
	other	validators
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
	<protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <49F79CF2.5080406 at stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Thanks for sending the files. I was not able to load them in Protege.

By looking at the error of the first validator, I could not figure out 
why it was complaining. In any case, I would trust the W3C validator 
more, and the files did validate there. So, I don't think there is any 
problem.

Tania

balajikumara T wrote:
> I used
> RDF backend (produces 3 files: rdfs, rdf, pprj)
>
> and i am attaching the file
>
> Thanks for the quick response
> Balaji
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Tania Tudorache 
> <tudorache at stanford.edu <mailto:tudorache at stanford.edu>>
wrote:
>
>     Did you use the RDF backend (produces 3 files: rdfs, rdf, pprj),
>     or did
>     you use the Protege-OWL backend (produces an OWL file and a pprj
>     file).
>
>     Can you post the file that did not validate?
>
>     Tania
>
>
>     balajikumara T wrote:
>     > Dear All
>     >  I created a protege Project and imported it to a RDF output.
>     > I then tried to validate the output using
>     > http://www.rdfabout.com/demo/validator/
>     >
>     > and I get the following error
>     > *Validation failed: Element is not allowed within a property with
>     > property attributes
>     > *
>     > But when i used the following Validator ,I get the Validation
>     Successful
>     > http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > So is there any standard Validator available which i can test
>     against
>     > or I should assume http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>     >
>     > as the base and proceed with that.
>     >
>     > Request your valuable inputs
>     >
>     > Thanks in Advance
>     > Balaji
>     >
>    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > protege-discussion mailing list
>     > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>     > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>     >
>     > Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     protege-discussion mailing list
>     protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>     Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>   



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:19:58 -0500
From: "Ron Schultz" <rcaschultz at gmail.com>
Subject: [protege-discussion] Protege Reporting
To: "'User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames
editor'"
	<protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <003801c9c870$fed739a0$fc85ace0$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

 I have been exploring reporting options from Prot?g? and am wondering what
others have seen. I know that there are utilities to convert a Prot?g?
ontology into a set of corresponding relational database tables, and then
run reports off of these tables. While this works, this seems like a great
deal of overhead to generate reports. The DocGen plug-in is more to my
liking, but it too has its limitations (primarily lack of flexibility in the
reporting output). 

Has anyone had experiences with other utilities? I tried iReport and
JasperReports against the XML, and while this works in a most basic sense,
Jasper renders HTML as raw text (and not formatted). This makes reporting on
slots that contain HTML fairly useless.

Any hints or pointers to other utilities would be appreciated.

Ron Schultz



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:12:10 +0100
From: Jonathan Carter <jonathan.carter at e-asolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Protege Reporting
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Message-ID:
	<20090429101210.ng9l1m87wkkocoos at webmail.enterprise-architecture.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Ron,

We've put together an XSL-based reporting framework that runs of the  
Experimental XML format of the Protege project.
OK, you need to get into a bit of XSL but we've tried to minimise that  
by having common templates for all the HTML page formatting.
XSL seems quite well suited to the sort of 'navigational' queries that 

we need to run on our projects and so far, despite some exploration, I  
haven't found an easier way to produce our reports. The good thing  
about the XML is that the structure of the project is easier to  
navigate and understand than the relational tables - it's just a list  
of all the instances in the project.

Hope this helps

Regards

Jonathan

_______________________________________

Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
_______________________________________

Proud sponsors of The Essential Project.
The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform
www.enterprise-architecture.org
_______________________________________

On 29 Apr 2009, at 03:19, Ron Schultz wrote:

I have been exploring reporting options from Prot?g? and am wondering what
others have seen. I know that there are utilities to convert a Prot?g?
ontology into a set of corresponding relational database tables, and then
run reports off of these tables. While this works, this seems like a great
deal of overhead to generate reports. The DocGen plug-in is more to my
liking, but it too has its limitations (primarily lack of flexibility in the
reporting output).

Has anyone had experiences with other utilities? I tried iReport and
JasperReports against the XML, and while this works in a most basic sense,
Jasper renders HTML as raw text (and not formatted). This makes reporting on
slots that contain HTML fairly useless.

Any hints or pointers to other utilities would be appreciated.

Ron Schultz

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing:  
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090429/4d940827/attachment-0001.htm


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:38:16 +0200
From: "Aaron Kaplan" <lists2546 at aaronkaplan.info>
Subject: [protege-discussion] svn problem
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Message-ID: <1241019496.28557.1312928897 at webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

When I try

  svn co
  http://smi-protege.stanford.edu/svn/protege4/protege-standalone/trunk/

I get 

  svn: Repository moved permanently to
  '/svn/protege4/protege-standalone/trunk/'; please relocate

(The supposed new location is the same as the one I was trying to
fetch.)

I found this FAQ, which suggests a misconfigured server.

  http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#301-error

-Aaron


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:51:57 -0700
From: Jennifer Vendetti <vendetti at stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] svn problem
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
	<protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <49F885AD.7010901 at stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hello Aaron,

The URL you listed below is only for viewing the Protege 4 source code 
via the ViewVC repository browsing software.

If you would like to check out the source code, please use this URL:

http://smi-protege.stanford.edu/repos/protege/protege4/protege-standalone/trunk/

Jennifer


Aaron Kaplan wrote:
> When I try
>
>   svn co
>   http://smi-protege.stanford.edu/svn/protege4/protege-standalone/trunk/
>
> I get 
>
>   svn: Repository moved permanently to
>   '/svn/protege4/protege-standalone/trunk/'; please relocate
>
> (The supposed new location is the same as the one I was trying to
> fetch.)
>
> I found this FAQ, which suggests a misconfigured server.
>
>   http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#301-error
>
> -Aaron
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>   


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion


End of protege-discussion Digest, Vol 33, Issue 30
**************************************************



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20090501/632c08c3/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list