[protege-discussion] WebProtege

[Tania Tudorache]

Hi Alex,

Seems like the website is down and I cannot download the picture. Do you 
have an owl file that causes this behavior?

Normally, equivalent classes should not cause problems to Protege OWL 3.

Thanks,
Tania

Alex Shkotin wrote:
> Hi Tania,
>  
> may be this is an example of infinite cycle:
> http://clip2net.com/clip/m3050/1257447788-clip-3kb.png
>  
> these two classes are just declared equivalent.
>  
> Alex
>
>
>  
> 2009/11/5 Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu 
> <mailto:tudorache at stanford.edu>>
>
>     Hi Anna,
>
>     We have a collaborator that implemented a big part of the
>     WebProtege backend with the OWL-API, but it is not yet released.
>     We do plan to have it soon. As much as possible we would like to
>     use more of the OWL-API. There are some complex functionalities
>     that we do not have yet working with the OWL-API (e.g.
>     collaboration, extensions to SWRL, etc.), and this is an impediment.
>
>     On the other hand, you should be able to use most Protege 4
>     ontologies in Protege 3 and WebProtege. There shouldn't be an
>     infinite cycle in P3. Can you send us an example OWL file with
>     this problem? You can send the file also off-line.
>
>     The Login problem is fixed in the next WebProtege release. The
>     Login button is now in the top right corner of WebProtege (similar
>     to the iGoogle page), and it is single sign-on for all ontologies,
>     which makes sense.
>
>     The list of ontologies that are shown in MyWebProtege tab are also
>     controlled by the access policies: you will only see the
>     ontologies for which you have read access.
>
>     We plan to have the new WebProtege release sometimes this month.
>
>     Tania
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "Anna Burla" <ANNABU at il.ibm.com <mailto:ANNABU at il.ibm.com>>
>     To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>     Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2009 7:53:01 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada
>     Pacific
>     Subject: [protege-discussion] WebProtege
>
>
>     Hello,
>     I am using Protege 4 for creating and viewing our ontology.
>     I want to use WebProtege and found few problematic issues:.
>     1) WebProtege works only with Protege 3.4 that doesn't support
>     well owl
>     files that were created in protege 4. It creates infinite loops in
>     classes
>     tree. Is it known issue?
>     2) On "My web protege" page there is no "login" icon. And only
>     when I enter
>     some project, I see "login" option.
>     Now if I logg in I still don't see projects that have "read/write"
>     access
>     for specific user and not "world" group. How can I by-pass this
>     problem?
>     All that I want is to define project that not all "world" group
>     can see,
>     but only few users.
>     Thanx a lot in advance,
>     Anna.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     protege-discussion mailing list
>     protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>     Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>     _______________________________________________
>     protege-discussion mailing list
>     protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>     <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>     Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20091105/a2e5cf6c/attachment.html>