Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] is-a relationship
Nada Bajnaid
nbajnaid at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 11 07:30:58 PST 2009
then can I inffer about the subclass relationship for ex: subclass (?x,?c) if x is-a subclass of c?
--- On Wed, 11/11/09, Timothy Redmond <tredmond at stanford.edu> wrote:
From: Timothy Redmond <tredmond at stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] is-a relationship
To: "User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor" <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 9:24 AM
On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Nada Bajnaid wrote:
> Thanks Auhood
> Then can I have some SWRL rules with is-a and inffer about it?
Yes this is part of the SWRL language. For instance to say that the SWRL variable ?x is a member of the Pizza class you can write
Pizza(?x)
-Timothy
>
> Regards
> Nada
>
> --- On Tue, 11/10/09, A A <auhoodf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: A A <auhoodf at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] is-a relationship
> To: "User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor" <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
> Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 8:48 AM
>
>
>
> I think the is-a relation is defined as a subclass relation implicitly. so you don't need to define it again.
> you can see the results when reasoning, e.g. if you write a query that finds all individuals of type persons you should be able to get all females as well as all individuals defined as persons.
>
> Auhood
>
>
> On 10 Nov 2009, at 12:26, Nada Bajnaid wrote:
>
> > where could I read more about is-a relationship. if I have female subclass of person then we have female is-a person. Do I need to define object property and name it is-a or its already defined by the subclass relationship? and how I could use it in the reasoning?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Nada
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > protege-discussion mailing list
> > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> >
> > Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20091111/7b259873/attachment.html>
More information about the protege-discussion
mailing list