[protege-discussion] Unable to connect to remote protege server using Ontology rich client invoked from webprotege

[Timothy Redmond]

> Yes, the server address is identical, however, when I connect from the
> Protege (non-web-start) client I don't need to use the port (:5200).
> If I do, it won't connect. The webstart, however, doesn't even accept 
> the OK button unless I append (:5200) - does that hint to any
> difference in server connectivity implementation between the two methods?

It sounds like that is the problem.   I don't know why you can't hit the
ok button without the :5200.   Try :1099 instead.

-Timothy


On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 19:05 +0000, Kai wrote:
> Timothy Redmond <tredmond <at> stanford.edu> writes:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know what to make of this exception.  It says that it failed  
> > to get data at some point when trying to connect to the rmi registry.   
> > This is the first network connection that a Protege client tries to  
> > make when it is attempting to connect to a server.  It happens before  
> > the client starts to connect and talk to the server (the client gets  
> > the server address from the rmiregistry).  It is also potentially the  
> > first data that the client will try to get off the network (it is not  
> > the read after a connect - it is a read during a connect).  If this  
> > wasn't java web start and if you hadn't successfully connected with a  
> > rich client then I would tell you that you are having a network problem.
> > 
> > Is the server address identical when you connect using java web start  
> > and the Protege rich client?
> > 
> > -Timothy
> > 
> 
> Yes, the server address is identical, however, when I connect from the
> Protege (non-web-start) client I don't need to use the port (:5200).
> If I do, it won't connect. The webstart, however, doesn't even accept 
> the OK button unless I append (:5200) - does that hint to any
> difference in server connectivity implementation between the two methods?
> 
> Kai.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> 
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03