[protege-discussion] Have trouble to find some terms in OWL file using Protege 3.4.1

[jiezheng at pcbi.upenn.edu]

Hi Thomas,

Thank you very much for your help. I will try as what you suggested.

Jie

Quoting Thomas Russ <tar at ISI.EDU>:

>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Jie Zheng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have problem to find the following two terms in Protege 3.4.1  
>> (It's OK by using Protege 4).
>>
>> fc_0035    Test of significance of Antithrombin-III level change  
>> between day 1 and day 4
>> fc_0002    RM Lowenthal
>>
>>
>> I attach the OWL file. Could you please find out why it happened?
>
> Probably because the type of those terms is not indicated by your  ontology.
>
> The terms are referred to by <rdf:Description...> tags, so there 
> isn't  any particular type informaiton (Individual, Class, Property, 
> etc.) in  the owl file you showed us.  I don't know if it is defined 
> in one of  the imported files.
>
> In any case, you can enable the display of such untyped RDF entities  
> in Protege 3.4.1 by going to the OWL > Preferences... menu item, and  
> then enabling the "Allow creation of external resources (untyped  
> URIs)" checkbox in the "General tab".
>
> It should then display the item as an instance of rdf:Description.
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: 
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>