[protege-discussion] Protege Client Server

[Jonathan Carter]

Thanks for checking, Timothy. Really appreciate it.

Good to know that it's all covered by 3.4.1

Regards

Jonathan

Sent from my mobile

On 2 Oct 2009, at 14:17, Timothy Redmond <tredmond at stanford.edu> wrote:

>
> Sorry for the delay.  I have been answering e-mails offline on my  
> commute and this one couldn't be done that way.  I checked the svn  
> logs and the  3.4.1 release does not have this bug.   The bug is  
> still present in the 3.4 release.
>
> -TImothy
>
>
>
>> I've just been reviewing the latest Protege Client Server Tutorial:
>>
>> http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/index.php/Protege_Client_Server_Tutorial_Configuration
>>
>> and noticed that in the table of Permissions, it mentions that  
>> there's a bug in the server that can cause data loss if you want to  
>> use the Write Access permission. I see that it says that this will  
>> be fixed in the next release and the link to the updated  
>> protege.jar is to a file that is older than the Protege 3.4.1  
>> release.
>>
>> Can I just confirm that the fix for this bug is already included in  
>> Protege 3.4.1?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jonathan
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> Jonathan Carter - Head of Technical Architecture
>> Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>> Web: www.enterprise-architecture.com
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> Proud sponsors of The Essential Project.
>> The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform
>>
>>
>> <essential_logo.png>
>> www.enterprise-architecture.org
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> W O R L D    C L A S S    A R C H I T E C T U R E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This message is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the  
>> exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the  
>> intended recipient(s) please notify the sender and delete the  
>> message immediately. Unauthorised disclosure, distribution and  
>> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. The opinions  
>> expressed within this message are those of the individual author.  
>> Whilst EAS Ltd take reasonable steps to scan this email it does not  
>> accept liability for any virus that may be contained in it. EAS  
>> Ltd, 29 Harley Street, London W1G 9QR. Telephone +44 (0)20 7612  
>> 4322 Fax +44 (0)20 7182 6749
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03