Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] uri, frames, owl or not
tredmond at stanford.edu
Mon Aug 2 09:46:02 PDT 2010
An ontology does not have to be published and the URI you choose
doesn't have to be web based. The URI you choose can simply be a name
for the ontology. There are some words in the OWL 2 specification that
an ontology "should" be accessible through its IRI but in other places
it is implicitly understood that this is not a reliable mechanism.
On 08/02/2010 09:36 AM, Richard Bogosian wrote:
> I am new to Protege and have a question regarding Frames and OWL
> versions. I downloaded what I believed to be Protege-Frames 4.1 Beta.
> When I run the program, it insists that I create a new OWL or select
> an existing OWL ontology. The part that bothers me is that when I
> select "create new", I am forced to provide a web-based uri. What if I
> don't want to publish anything to the internet. Is there some way
> around this requirement? If I am working on proprietary information, I
> won't want to risk putting it on any website. I am going thru the
> documentation but so far I've seen nothing that addresses this issue.
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-discussion