[protege-discussion] Synonym relationships

[Cecil O. Lynch, MD, MS]

If you want to do more fine grained mapping you can also import SKOS.

Cecil

-----Original Message-----
From: protege-discussion-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu
[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas
Russ
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:17 AM
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Synonym relationships


On Aug 31, 2010, at 1:59 AM, manjula wijewickrema wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Is there any way to buid synonym relationships in Protege 4.?

Several.

One is as Alex Shkotin suggested, to use equivalentClass,  
equivalentProperty or sameAs.

Another is to create a single class or individual with the meaning you  
want and use (annotation) properties to associate different strings  
with that single class.

A third is to use your own (annotation) property to link the items  
that are supposed to be synonyms.



_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03