[protege-discussion] [protege-owl] Axiome?

[Obrst, Leo J.]

Great, thanks, Saeed. I thought the dev list also got sent to the owl list. 

And yes, that explains my problem. I have no rules and  thought Axime was also a tool that enabled construction of rules ala the SWRL tab. Apparently not. Ok, I'll create rules via SWRL and then use Axime.

This was not apparent to me.

Thanks,
Leo

_____________________________________________ 
Dr. Leo Obrst		The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics 
lobrst at mitre.org  	Information Discovery & Understanding, Command & Control Center
Voice: 703-983-6770	7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305 
Fax: 703-983-1379	McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA

  


-----Original Message-----
From: protege-owl-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu [mailto:protege-owl-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Saeed Hassanpour
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:56 AM
To: User support for the Protege-OWL editor; protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [protege-owl] [protege-discussion] Axiome?

Hi Leo,

For now on could you please post the question to protege-owl mailing
list <protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu>?

Axiome works based on syntactic structure of rules and tries to parse
them. So if there is a structural/syntactic problem with rules, it
returns blank. I suggest to review the rules to make sure that they
are syntactically correct.
If everything looks right in the rule base, you can send the rule base
+ ontology to me, I 'll be happy to take a look and find out what
causes the problem.

Best,
Saeed
_______________________________________________
protege-owl mailing list
protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03