Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Protege 3.4.2 + DB yields <deleted frame> although frame not deleted

Tania Tudorache tudorache at
Wed Feb 3 16:47:50 PST 2010

Hi Oliver,

We have released today Protege 3.4.3 that contains the fix for the 
<deleted frames> problem. Please give it a try and let us know if it works.


Olivier Biot wrote:
> Thank you for confirming. I am looking forward to this patch :-)
> However I believe I did not have to delete instances to get these
> "<deleted frame>" messages. Even when moving classes in the hiearchy
> this happens at times.
> Best regards,
> Olivier
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Tania Tudorache <tudorache at> wrote:
>> There is a cache bug for deletions for the database backend. Tim is fixing
>> it now.
>> Fortunately, this is not a serious bug, just a cache problem. If you restart
>> Protege, the <delete frames> will not show up anymore.
>> Tania
>> Olivier Biot wrote:
>>> Is it possible that Protege 3.4.2 defaults the label text to "<deleted
>>> frame>" if it can't read it in time from the database? This is very
>>> confusing.
>>> I'm using rdfs:label for storing the label text for classes,
>>> properties and instances.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at
> Instructions for unsubscribing:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the protege-discussion mailing list