Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Protege 3.4.2 + DB yields <deleted frame> although frame not deleted

Tania Tudorache tudorache at stanford.edu
Fri Feb 12 17:32:57 PST 2010


I just saw that Tim already replied to this issue on the owl list. This 
was a minor UI configuration bug.

The next release will contain the fix.

Tania

Tania Tudorache wrote:
> Olivier,
>
> I cannot reproduce this problem. Does it happen only with the database 
> backend?
>
> This does not look like a caching problem. Possibly some exceptions 
> are thrown in the console related to the UI, most likely the domain 
> and range widgets.
>
> Can you please send the exceptions from the console?
>
> Thanks,
> Tania
>
> Olivier Biot wrote:
>> There's good and bad news regarding 3.4.3. I tested on an OWL
>> ontology, with Protege-OWL.
>>
>> The good news is that I can't reproduce this issue with 3.4.3.
>>
>> The bad news is that there is a new caching bug in 3.4.3:
>>
>> Create a new default OWL-DL ontology.
>> Add a few classes.
>> Add a property.
>> Set the domain or the range of the property.
>> => you can't select the previously created classes, unless you close
>> and reopen the project.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu> wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi Oliver,
>>>
>>> We have released today Protege 3.4.3 that contains the fix for the <deleted
>>> frames> problem. Please give it a try and let us know if it works.
>>>
>>> Tania
>>>
>>> Olivier Biot wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for confirming. I am looking forward to this patch :-)
>>> However I believe I did not have to delete instances to get these
>>> "<deleted frame>" messages. Even when moving classes in the hiearchy
>>> this happens at times.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Olivier
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> There is a cache bug for deletions for the database backend. Tim is fixing
>>> it now.
>>> Fortunately, this is not a serious bug, just a cache problem. If you restart
>>> Protege, the <delete frames> will not show up anymore.
>>> Tania
>>> Olivier Biot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible that Protege 3.4.2 defaults the label text to "<deleted
>>> frame>" if it can't read it in time from the database? This is very
>>> confusing.
>>> I'm using rdfs:label for storing the label text for classes,
>>> properties and instances.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>>
>>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20100212/0829d44d/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list