Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] First question, and a test

Peris Brodsky perisbrodsky2011 at
Tue Mar 23 07:32:57 PDT 2010

So I could still create instances of classes in the immutable project?

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Safran, Tracy (NIH/NCI) [C] <
safrant at> wrote:

> You could have the immutable project be separate and imported into the
> mutable project.
> Tracy M. Safran
> Contractor - SAIC Frederick
> EVS support
> 301-402-1537
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCY [mailto:ccy.clary at]
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 7:01 PM
> To: protege-discussion at
> Subject: [protege-discussion] First question, and a test
> Greetings, all.
> This list doesn't seem to be as busy as advertised, so I'm doing a test of
> it, in addition to asking my first question.
> I'm new to ontology, and to Protégé, so forgive my lack of foundation here.
> As I would use Protégé, in a production software medical device product,
> ontology design and knowledge acquisition would occur on two very different
> time scales, and be performed by distinct groups of people.
> In what mode of usage can Protégé provide an immutable view of an ontology
> (project), while allowing full mutation of knowledge (instances)? This sort
> of implies an authenticated multiuser environment, which the Protégé
> multi-user mode seems to support. But what I can't tell from the
> documentation is whether the policy mechanisms can support instance-only
> editing mode that I describe.
> Thanks in advance...
> -Peris
> --
> "Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?"
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the protege-discussion mailing list