Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] evalyation of ontology

Tale Lawrence noellope2007 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 1 01:08:15 PDT 2010


Thanks so much. I have used the reasoner and there was no inconsistency. but
you in the academics they still want some other things like mathematical
proofs for the research to be accepted. this is the problem I am having.


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Timothy Redmond <tredmond at stanford.edu>wrote:

>  On 08/30/2010 07:30 PM, Tale Lawrence wrote:
>
> Dear All, Please can anyone help me with tutorial that can simply guide me
> through evaluating the ontology i just built using OWL protege 3.4.1.
> Thanks.
>
>
> I don't think that this is a very good answer but one thing that you can do
> is to run a reasoner and see if there are any unexpected conclusions.  The
> most obvious unexpected conclusion would be that the ontology is
> inconsistent or that some classes that you wanted to use are inconsistent.
>
> I think that the above is a good thing to do but it is far from being
> enough.  But in this level of generality I am not sure what to tell you.
> Perhaps someone else will be able to give you a more comprehensive answer.
>
> -Timothy
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing listprotege-discussion at lists.stanford.eduhttps://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20100901/3a2438c4/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list