Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] evalyation of ontology

Tale Lawrence noellope2007 at
Wed Sep 1 19:18:40 PDT 2010

I will think on how to explain this in detail in my technical report.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Timothy Redmond <tredmond at>wrote:

>  On 09/01/2010 01:08 AM, Tale Lawrence wrote:
> Thanks so much. I have used the reasoner and there was no inconsistency.
> but you in the academics they still want some other things like mathematical
> proofs for the research to be accepted. this is the problem I am having.
> Mathematical proofs of what?  I think that such an evaluation of the
> ontology would somehow depend on an analysis of what the ontology is
> intended  to do.
> -Timothy
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the protege-discussion mailing list