Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] WebProtege Problem
Christa.Illibauer at scch.at
Thu Sep 16 23:02:08 PDT 2010
I now have installed Protégé 3.x and I can edit and change the metaproject. It works fine.
From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu [mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Tania Tudorache
Sent: Freitag, 17. September 2010 02:51
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] WebProtege Problem
If you use the local mode of WebProtege, you need to edit the metaproject using Protege 3.x, not Protege 4. If you modify the metaproject, you need to restart tomcat to get the changes.
If you would be using the external server mode, then you could modify the metaproject at runtime by using the Admin Server application , and the changes would take effect immediately.
On 09/15/2010 11:28 PM, Illibauer Christa wrote:
I have installed WebProtege (Version 2010.05.12) local mode as described in the WebProtege Administrator's Guide.
When I start WebProtege I can see the provided Ontologies (Collaborative Newspaper, Collaborative Pizza, Newspaper, Pizza, Wines) but I cannot see the column Action as Shown in the Section "Test the WebProtege Installation".
Furthermore, I do not know how I can view or update the metaproject (as told in the installation guide), since there is nothing on the User Interface to do this. (no button or menu to open).
When I try to open the metaproject.pprj file with the Protégé 4.0 I get a SaxException, therefore, I do not know how do view (edit) the metaproject.
I want to create my own ontologies by using WebProtege, but it seems that this is not possible. My question is, can WebProtege only be used to view some example ontologies?
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-discussion