Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Fuzzy

praviin niikumbh praviinn at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 8 05:53:11 PST 2011


Hi
U can get some papers on fuzzzy ontology in google. 
u  can think of a domain in medicine or process design for example the standardization in manufacturing process.
Am also looking at some application in same domain
pravin


________________________________
From: Timothy Redmond <tredmond at stanford.edu>
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu 
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Fuzzy



Doing fuzzy stuff right is hard.  I don't know of a good fit in the OWL world.  The closest thing that I can come up with is the probabilistic Pronto language that the clark-parsia people are doing.

-Timothy


On 12/04/2011 11:55 PM, Tanumeet Kaur Juneja wrote: 
hello, 
>want to make a fuzzy ontology..any suggestions for the domain in which it can be designed..not able to decide fuzzy ontology of what?
>Please reply.
>Thank u.
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20111208/c6945e9b/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list