Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Using the Tutorial: Things don't look right

maroun marouncorbane at
Sun Jun 19 22:47:12 PDT 2011

Hi Bruce,

                                           <Thanks so much.  I'm finding it
you are most welcomed.

       < So, I got the vocabulary named BIO for Biographic information and 
imported it into Protégé 3.x.  Strangely it didn't actually import or 
include a namespace prefix of bio.  So, I'm a little confused.  If the 
vocabulary is defined and available on the web, should I or do I need to 
import it to use it?  Or do I just add a namespace prefix which links to the 
vocabulary specification?>

I definitely recommend that you use Protégé 4.1 (build 234) or later. you
can find download information
Thus, I have no exact reply regarding BIO vocabulary because I actually
never used it, I find no problem while importing this vocabulary; I went to
the active ontology --> import : I wrote the uri: and when I go to the object or data property
It is all there.


FOAF did represent some problems earlier as I remember regarding properties,
with properties that are datatype and object properties at the same time;
you can check this topic if you are interested.


View this message in context:
Sent from the Protege Discussion mailing list archive at

More information about the protege-discussion mailing list