Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Protege 4.* and Collaborative/Web Protege Compatibility

Tania Tudorache tudorache at stanford.edu
Thu May 26 16:23:27 PDT 2011


We already have an alpha version of WebProtege that uses the OWL-API in 
the backend. It is available in the SVN in the webprotege owlapi branch. 
We may release it sometimes in fall.

Tania


On 05/05/2011 02:27 AM, Anna Zhukova wrote:
> Dear Protege developers,
>
> I'm developing an ontology in OWL 2.0 with Protege 4.1 and looking for 
> collaborative tools, such as Collaborative Protege/WebProtege. 
> Unfortunately, I cannot use Protege 3.4.6 as my ontology contains OWL 
> 2.0 features that are supported only in Protege 4.*. I've looked at 
> the WebProtege Roadmap and learnt, that you are planning to "Port 
> server-side code from the Protege 3 APIs to Protege 4 and the OWL-API 
> -/medium term/". But could you specify more concrete dates, how soon 
> it's going to be released?
>
> Thanks,
> Anna Zhukova
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20110526/9cccfa72/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list