Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Protege as core to a software development environment

Yu Lin linikujp at yahoo.co.jp
Thu Nov 17 08:38:51 PST 2011


Hi,
Check out this link: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-524/
The paper you liked is for a workshop in ISWC2009.
Maybe you can find something useful there in all workshop papers.

Best,
Asiyah


On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Yu Lin <linikujp at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Check out this link: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-524/
> The paper you liked is for a workshop in ISWC2009.
> Maybe you can find something useful there in all workshop papers.
>
> Best,
> Asiyah
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Jonathan Carter <
> jonathan.carter at e-asolutions.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I haven't got any presentations or other documents, but I've been using
>> Protege as the infrastructure for some software that builds and manages an
>> ontology that represents a model for enterprise architecture of any
>> organisation. I would certainly agree with the assertions that using it
>> 'instead of' a database has indeed delivered fantastic flexibility and
>> adaptability - providing exactly what we were looking for. The underlying
>> meta model of Protege has been - to quote the abstract - "enabling
>> representation of views on ontology's and their corresponding metadata in
>> the same framework." For us, this means that we can model and manage a
>> complex model of interdependencies between all elements of our domain but
>> separately provide meaningful and easy-to-use views of this model to a wide
>> variety of stakeholders - not just enterprise architects!
>>
>> I realise this isn't exactly what you were after but as our experience
>> seemed to roughly match the assertions of the abstract, I would provide
>> that feedback. Hope it helps and maybe there's a paper in here somewhere...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jonathan
>>  _______________________________________
>>
>> Jonathan Carter
>> Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> Proud sponsors of The Essential Project
>> The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform
>> www.enterprise-architecture.org
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd, Registered in England and Wales:
>> 04097721.
>> Registered Office: 76 High Street, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes, MK16
>> 8AQ.
>>
>> On 17 Nov 2011, at 09:18, Brice Sommacal wrote:
>>
>> I'm also interested by any supports that you could share.
>>
>> Brice
>>
>> 2011/11/16 Ron Schultz <rcaschultz at gmail.com>
>>
>>> A while ago I read the Protege Team article Ontology-Driven
>>> Software:What We Learned From Using Ontologies As Infrastructure For
>>> Software. I was wondering if there were any follow-on articles,
>>> presentations, or conference proceedings further detailing this approach.
>>>
>>> I am particularly intrigued in the assertion in the abstract that "we
>>> show that it is feasible to describe the structure of the data that drives
>>> an application using anthologies rather than database schemas, which are
>>> used traditionally to store the infrastructure data. We also show that such
>>> an approach provides critical advantages in terms of flexibility and
>>> adaptability of the tool itself. We demonstrate the extensibility of the
>>> approach by enabling representation of views on ontology's and their
>>> corresponding metadata in the same framework."
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ron
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>>
>>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20111117/c32b0f0d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list