Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Protege as core to a software development environment

Nick Khamis symack at gmail.com
Thu Nov 17 17:46:22 PST 2011


And you could visit our research lab website at:

www.semanticsoftware.info
www.aseg.cs.concordia.ca

Ninus.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Csongor Nyulas
<csongor.nyulas at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hi Ron, and all,
>
> I would suggest you to look at the papers that came out from the NCBO
> BioPortal project:
> http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/project.php/ncbo
>
> As well as other (more recent) paper's from the authors:
> http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/by_author.php/csongor_i_nyulas
> http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/by_author.php/natasha_f_noy
> http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/by_author.php/michael_v_dorf
>
> Here are just a couple of the papers that could be of more interest:
> http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/view.php/semantic_infrastructure_to_enable_collaboration_in_ontology_development
> http://bmir.stanford.edu/publications/view.php/bioportal_enhanced_functionality_via_new_web_services_from_the_national_center_for_biomedical_ontology_to_access_and_use_ontologies_in_software_applications
>
> The statement in the abstract that you have cited has definitely kept its
> validity. After more than 2 years, the metadata infrastructure of the
> BioPortal is still maintained as an ontology, which described in the paper
> (and which, in the meantime, has evolved of course), and this had provided
> us with great flexibility and opportunities in extending the functionality
> and the services provided by the platform. We are using ontologies also to
> define the structure of the notes and mappings in BioPortal, which offered
> us the same great flexibility and opportunities to evolve.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Csongor
>
> On 11/16/2011 6:53 AM, Ron Schultz wrote:
>
> A while ago I read the Protege Team article Ontology-Driven Software:What We
> Learned From Using Ontologies As Infrastructure For Software. I was
> wondering if there were any follow-on articles, presentations, or conference
> proceedings further detailing this approach.
> I am particularly intrigued in the assertion in the abstract that "we show
> that it is feasible to describe the structure of the data that drives an
> application using anthologies rather than database schemas, which are used
> traditionally to store the infrastructure data. We also show that such an
> approach provides critical advantages in terms of flexibility and
> adaptability of the tool itself. We demonstrate the extensibility of the
> approach by enabling representation of views on ontology's and their
> corresponding metadata in the same framework."
>
> --
> Ron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list