[protege-discussion] Protege 4.* and Collaborative/Web Protege Compatibility

[Stephen Estes]

Hello Tania and team,

What is your current outlook on making Collaborative Protege / Web Protege available as beta or otherwise?

Thanks,
-- Stephen Estes

On May 26, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Tania Tudorache wrote:

> We already have an alpha version of WebProtege that uses the OWL-API in the backend. It is available in the SVN in the webprotege owlapi branch. We may release it sometimes in fall.
> 
> Tania
> 
> 
> On 05/05/2011 02:27 AM, Anna Zhukova wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Protege developers,
>> 
>> I'm developing an ontology in OWL 2.0 with Protege 4.1 and looking for collaborative tools, such as Collaborative Protege/WebProtege. Unfortunately, I cannot use Protege 3.4.6 as my ontology contains OWL 2.0 features that are supported only in Protege 4.*. I've looked at the WebProtege Roadmap and learnt, that you are planning to "Port server-side code from the Protege 3 APIs to Protege 4 and the OWL-API - medium term". But could you specify more concrete dates, how soon it's going to be released?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Anna Zhukova
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>> 
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
> 
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> 
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20110930/9e52b492/attachment.html>