Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] RE(3): Fwd: methodology

Frank Loebe frank.loebe at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Fri Jan 27 06:43:48 PST 2012


Hi Ghalem,

unfortunately, I'm not aware of more up-to-date information myself.

Other mailing lists might be more appropriate, e.g. the one of the
ontolog-community [1].

I'm sorry,
but best regards,
Frank


[1] mailto:ontolog-forum at ontolog.cim3.net

    http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ghalem Ouadjed (EOWEO) [mailto:gouadjed at eoweo.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:51 PM
> To: Frank Loebe
> Cc: 'User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor'
> Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Fwd: methodology
> 
> Hi Franck,
> thank you for your message.
> Actually i m aware about this reference and it seems that it is not
> actualised and for instance the metaclasses are not available as a tool or
> as a resource i could use.
> The vision is very usefull et helpness for people who want to understand
> how to build a coherent ontology and i don t understand why there s no
> more resources about it.
> That s why i m asking if there s an evolution or a transformation of that
> methodology (maybe with another name than ontoclean) have been made and if
> not, well i will use what i got about it.
> 
> Cheers
> Ghalem
> 
> Le 27/01/2012 14:36, Frank Loebe a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure whether I get your question completely right, but if you
> > are looking for literature/material on OntoClean, are you aware of [1]?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Frank Loebe
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.ontoclean.org/
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: protege-discussion-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu
> >> [mailto:protege- discussion-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu] On Behalf
> >> Of Ghalem Ouadjed
> >> (EOWEO)
> >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 1:52 PM
> >> To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
> >> Subject: [protege-discussion] Fwd: methodology
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >> sorry in advance to repost my last question about the methodology but
> >> i haven t get any answer about it.
> >> is of you know if there s a specific reason about the fact no answer
> >> has been produced regarding this topic pls?
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance for your time
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Ghalem
> >>
> >> Hi
> >> I m interested on OntoClean Methodology but i don t find enough
> >> resources that could help me to build a king of knowledge about it.
> >> do you know a nice content that is usefull about that pls? maybe
> >> there s some evolutions i don t know about?
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Ghalem



More information about the protege-discussion mailing list