Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Fwd: WebProtege

Tania Tudorache tudorache at
Fri Nov 9 15:01:05 PST 2012

Hi Matthew,

We have recently changed the location of SVN for WebProtege 1.0 (the one 
that works with Protege 3.x). This is the new SVN location that you 
should check out:

Sorry, I thought I have updated the wiki description, but obviously, I 
haven't. I just did now..

The SVN version will work also with the latest Protege 3.x release, so 
you can use newer versions of Protege 3.x. It also works with GWT 2.4.

There is a newer version of WebProtege 2.0 that works with the OWL-API, 
and that has a reimplemented backend (which is what you have 
checked-out). That version is not yet ready for plugins or development, 
as we are still cleaning it up.

Let us know if you still have problems.


On 11/08/2012 11:51 PM, matthew lange wrote:
> I am getting a whole host of errors that I don't understand, including 
> a fail to build in Eclipse.
> I am following the build instructions here 
> <>. 
>  Upon attempting to build, I get the workspace build message:
> "
> Building workspace has encountered a problem.
> Errors occurred during the build.
> Errors running builder 'Google App Engine Project Change Notifier' on 
> project 'WebProtegeICF'.
> NO_MODIFICATION_ALLOWED_ERR: An attempt is made to modify an object 
> where modifications are not allowed."
> Further errors are attached.
> I am using jars from protege 3.5.1 beta as instructed in linked 
> webpage above. WebProtege is from trunk on SVN.
> All files except the junit jar are in my personal directory with 
> read/write access.
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at
> Instructions for unsubscribing:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the protege-discussion mailing list