Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Fwd: WebProtege
mclange at ucdavis.edu
Fri Nov 9 17:09:03 PST 2012
I don't mind hacking on the bleeding edge--can stick with what I have,
and be including libraries from the more recent OWL Protege Servers? I
am more interested in OWL compliance anyway...
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
> We have recently changed the location of SVN for WebProtege 1.0 (the one
> that works with Protege 3.x). This is the new SVN location that you should
> check out:
> Sorry, I thought I have updated the wiki description, but obviously, I
> haven't. I just did now..
> The SVN version will work also with the latest Protege 3.x release, so you
> can use newer versions of Protege 3.x. It also works with GWT 2.4.
> There is a newer version of WebProtege 2.0 that works with the OWL-API, and
> that has a reimplemented backend (which is what you have checked-out). That
> version is not yet ready for plugins or development, as we are still
> cleaning it up.
> Let us know if you still have problems.
> On 11/08/2012 11:51 PM, matthew lange wrote:
> I am getting a whole host of errors that I don't understand, including a
> fail to build in Eclipse.
> I am following the build instructions here. Upon attempting to build, I get
> the workspace build message:
> Building workspace has encountered a problem.
> Errors occurred during the build.
> Errors running builder 'Google App Engine Project Change Notifier' on
> project 'WebProtegeICF'.
> NO_MODIFICATION_ALLOWED_ERR: An attempt is made to modify an object where
> modifications are not allowed."
> Further errors are attached.
> I am using jars from protege 3.5.1 beta as instructed in linked webpage
> above. WebProtege is from trunk on SVN.
> All files except the junit jar are in my personal directory with read/write
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
More information about the protege-discussion