Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Referring to classes outside an ontology
matthew.horridge at stanford.edu
Tue Oct 16 16:59:14 PDT 2012
This seems o.k. to me. (Providing faldo;Region expands to the full IRI of the class in the external ontology). The light font-weight (as opposed to bold) indicates that you haven't said anything about the class in the current ontology.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:39, Joachim Baran wrote:
> I would just like to hear some feedback whether my approach of integrating classes outside of my own ontology is correct.
> I added the following snippet to my ontology, where I basically want to express that the range of my "region" object property is an instance of the "Region" class from the FALDO ontology.
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3#GFF3_0021">
> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3#GFF3_0002"/>
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&faldo;Region"/>
> When I load the ontology in Protege 4.1, I see that "Region" has been added to the class list, but it is shown in a normal type rather than bold faced.
> Is this the right approach to link out to other ontologies and is it expected that the other class appears among my defined classes?
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-discussion