Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Any viable approach to develop KBS using Protégé?

Addib Navilla ed_navilla at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 15 00:54:40 PDT 2013


Hi Michael DeBellis, 

Thanks for your reply. I will consider to look at Semantic Web Programming. 
I'm thinking to develop KBS by using Jess together with Protege. Still doing some studies on this.


Hi Bradley,

Good information. Thanks for your reply. Will look on it.

Rgs,
Addib


________________________________
 From: Bradley Shoebottom <bradley.shoebottom at Innovatia.net>
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>; Addib Navilla <ed_navilla at yahoo.com> 
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 1:30 AM
Subject: RE: [protege-discussion] Any viable approach to develop KBS using	Protégé?
 


 
Alex Garcia examines various methodologies for developing ontologies here:
 
http://oa.upm.es/5654/2/CL13_Garc%C3%ADaEtAl_OntologiesDecentralisedSettings.pdf
 
But his PhD thesis has more methodologies
 
http://www.alexandergarcia.name/node/19
 
I myself have used the methodology on Page 116 several times.
 
Bradley Shoebottom
Information Architect
Phone:(506) 674-5439  |   Toll-Free: (800) 363-3358
Skype:bradley.shoebottom
Email:bradley.shoebottom at innovatia.net

www.innovatia.net
 
From:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu [mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Michael DeBellis
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 2:15 PM
To: Addib Navilla; User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Any viable approach to develop KBS using Protege?
 
Programming the Semantic Web by Toby Segran, Colin Evans, and Jamie Taylor has some good examples of developing systems base on ontologies and uses Protege as their tool for developing the ontology. 
 
Semantic Web Programming by John Hebeler et. al does as well. 
 
I liked both of them, I think they are both worth getting.
 
But they don't actually have a methodology, if you are looking for that, sort of a Rational Unified Process (RUP) for Semantic Web systems my guess is its kind of soon for that, methodologies make sense after people have learned lessons from experience and I don't think there is enough experience yet, although others probably disagree.
 
Also, if you are looking for a methodology to build systems cost effectively I would highly recommend you take a look at Agile Methods. I've used all sorts of techniques in my career Andersen's Method/1, RUP, etc. and I think Agile is unquestionably the way to go regardless of the kind of system you are developing or the technology you are developing it with, it really focuses the team on what is important.
 
Michael DeBellis
 
--- On Thu, 4/11/13, Addib Navilla <ed_navilla at yahoo.com> wrote

From: Addib Navilla <ed_navilla at yahoo.com>
Subject: [protege-discussion] Any viable approach to develop KBS using Protege?
To: "protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu" <protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
Date: Thursday, April 11, 2013, 10:02 AM
Hi
 
Can anyone help me to suggest any viable approach to develop Knowledge-based system using Protege?
 
Thanks
Addib
 
 
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:21:07 -0700
From: Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu>
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Help : Enquiry for PSM Librarian
Message-ID: <kjhvf0$lhk$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

Hi,

I am afraid the PSM Librarian is no longer supported by the Protege 
team. It's not a viable method to develop knowledge-based systems using 
Protege.

Samson

On 4/3/2013 6:19 AM, Addib Navilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Protege and I need help to get some information.
>
> FYI, I'm planning to use Protege 3.3.1 and PSM Librarian 3.1 Plugin in
> my project. I intend to experiment with the Protege PSMs to develop
> knowledge-based system.  I?ve identified two PSMs that can be
> potentially used in my project: the "Cover & Differentiate" and the
> "Iterative/piece-oriented? methods. However, there is no UPML
> description for the "Iterative/piece-oriented? method in the PSM Library.
>
> I will appreciate if you could kindly advise me where I can obtain the
> Protege codes for the "Iterative/piece-oriented? method, as well as
> useful information on how to use the Protege?s PSMs. Please advise if
> there is new approach in building knowledge based system using Protege.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Addib

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20130415/32f7f537/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5910 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20130415/32f7f537/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list