Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?

Mike Waters quaestor at
Thu Apr 26 08:24:47 PDT 2007


what are these additional restrictions to your datatype values? There are a number of reasoner projects hosted on SemWebCentral, so you could start there, but knowing the particular functionality required would permit a more focussed assistance.



------- Original Message -------
From: Jane Eisenstein <janee at>
To: User support for the Protege-OWL editor <protege-owl at>
Sent: 26/04/07, 12:53:13
Subject: [protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?

I am working on an OWL ontology containing datatype value  
restrictions not supported by DIG 1.0. Are there any SWRL engine  
implementations that do not depend on DIG 1.0? If not, are there any  
other rule systems that work with such OWL ontologies and do not  
depend on DIG 1.0?

If this is the wrong group for this question, please point me in the  
right direction to get this answered.

Jane Eisenstein

protege-owl mailing list
protege-owl at

Instructions for unsubscribing: 

More information about the protege-owl mailing list