Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?
quaestor at ntlworld.com
Thu Apr 26 08:24:47 PDT 2007
what are these additional restrictions to your datatype values? There are a number of reasoner projects hosted on SemWebCentral, so you could start there, but knowing the particular functionality required would permit a more focussed assistance.
------- Original Message -------
From: Jane Eisenstein <janee at softweave.com>
To: User support for the Protege-OWL editor <protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu>
Sent: 26/04/07, 12:53:13
Subject: [protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?
I am working on an OWL ontology containing datatype value
restrictions not supported by DIG 1.0. Are there any SWRL engine
implementations that do not depend on DIG 1.0? If not, are there any
other rule systems that work with such OWL ontologies and do not
depend on DIG 1.0?
If this is the wrong group for this question, please point me in the
right direction to get this answered.
protege-owl mailing list
protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-owl