Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?

Jane Eisenstein janee at
Thu Apr 26 09:05:32 PDT 2007

On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
> what are these additional restrictions to your datatype values?  
> There are a number of reasoner projects hosted on SemWebCentral, so  
> you could start there, but knowing the particular functionality  
> required would permit a more focussed assistance.

I am primarily looking for a SWRL rule engine that does not use DIG  
1.0 to move data in and out. It is my understanding that the Protege  
Jess SWRLRuleEngineBridge does depend on DIG 1.0 for this.

My ontology includes necessary and sufficient conditions that depend  
on particular datatype values. For example, an  
EndocrinologyProviderSpecialtyCode is defined having the value "ENDO":

   <owl:Class rdf:about="#EndocrinologyProviderSpecialtyCode">
     <owl:disjointWith rdf:resource="#OncologyProviderSpecialtyCode"/>
       <owl:Class rdf:about="#CardiologyProviderSpecialtyCode"/>
         <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
           <owl:Class rdf:about="#ProviderSpecialtyCode"/>
             <owl:hasValue rdf:datatype=" 
               <owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="#hasCode"/>

Pellet 1.4 supports this. DIG 1.0 does not support this.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the protege-owl mailing list