Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?
janee at softweave.com
Thu Apr 26 13:00:13 PDT 2007
Lovely. Thank you.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> from the following post to the Pellet users mailing list, it seems
> that Pellet should satisfy the requirements for a reasoner to
> handle the owl:Restriction problem. However, it looks as if the
> efficiency improvement suggestion is also appropriate.
More information about the protege-owl