Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] SWRL evaluation without DIG 1.0?

Jane Eisenstein janee at
Thu Apr 26 13:00:13 PDT 2007

Lovely. Thank you.

On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Mike Waters wrote:

> from the following post to the Pellet users mailing list, it seems  
> that Pellet should satisfy the requirements for a reasoner to  
> handle the owl:Restriction problem. However, it looks as if the  
> efficiency improvement suggestion is also appropriate.
> Regards,
> Mike
> 001207.html

More information about the protege-owl mailing list