Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] protege/swrltab sameAs?
martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Wed Jan 9 15:14:47 PST 2008
Yes - sameAs (and differentFrom) apply only to OWL individuals. cf. the
language FAQ .
Make sure to use the latest Protege 3.4 beta if you are going to
experiment with SWRL extensively.
Csongor Nyulas wrote:
>You are probably looking for:
>Hope this helps,
>>In the vein of 'swrltab for dummies'...
>>I've been playing with Protege/SWRL for a prototype, and run into something
>>that seems odd to me. I was trying to construct a simple case of an
>>impossible antecedent, something like:
>> 3=4 -> Foo(bar, 1)
>>As I understand it, 3=4 would be expressed as swrlb:sameAs(3, 4). However,
>>the rule editor doesn't recognize the sameAs token, whether it's unprefixed,
>>or prefixed with any of [swrl, swrlb, owl]:. By the way, what I wanted to
>>enter was this:
>> sameAs(3, 4) -> Foo(bar, 1)
>>In any case, I did some googling, and looking at the various protege/swrl
>>pages, and haven't found anything yet. Am I botching something either with
>>my input, or my assumptions? Thanks!
>>PS -- I am using protege 3.2.1, and tried 3.3.1 as well, getting the same
>>protege-owl mailing list
>>protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
>>Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>protege-owl mailing list
>protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
>Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-owl