Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] adding ontologies
martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Fri Jan 11 09:01:09 PST 2008
No - you shouldn't model these relationships in rules - however, more
complex mappings may require SWRL.
I would look at the merging functionality in Protege 4 as suggested in
Matthew's response to this question.
Alexander Musidlowski wrote:
>i already took a look to SWRL and i´m sure i will need it, but later.
>First of all i try to implement relationships like subProperty or
>equivalentClass. As far as i know these are feature of RDF/OWL. I
>don´t know why i should model these relationsships in rules (and i
>don´t know how).
>I assume it is possible to combine the SWRL Factory API and OWL API,
>isn´t it? I won´t have to change things like loading the ontology or
>something like that?!
More information about the protege-owl