Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] adding ontologies

Martin O'Connor martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Fri Jan 11 09:01:09 PST 2008


No - you shouldn't model these relationships in rules - however, more 
complex mappings may require SWRL.

I would look at the merging functionality in Protege 4 as suggested in 
Matthew's response to this question.

Martin

Alexander Musidlowski wrote:

>Hi,
>
>i already took a look to SWRL and i´m sure i will need it, but later.
>First of all i try to implement relationships like subProperty or
>equivalentClass. As far as i know these are feature of RDF/OWL. I
>don´t know why i should model these relationsships in rules (and i
>don´t know how).
>I assume it is possible to combine the SWRL Factory API and OWL API,
>isn´t it? I won´t have to change things like loading the ontology or
>something like that?!
>
>  
>




More information about the protege-owl mailing list