Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] Could swrl rules be separated from the OWL knowledge base?

Martin O'Connor martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Sat Jan 26 12:44:21 PST 2008


You can simply store all the SWRL rules in one OWL file and import as 
necessary. However, you should not regard SWRL rules as semantically 
separate from the ontology - in an ontology they have the same formal 
status as other OWL axioms. SWRL rules should be considered as just 
another type of OWL axiom.

Martin

adu wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I’m a newbie to SWRL and what I want is to have a rule base, which 
> could be separated from the OWL knowledge base and the rules could 
> later be imported into the knowledge base and fired. I’m not sure 
> whether it is possible to do this using SWRL. Could anyone give me an 
> answer or suggestion? Thanks a lot J
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jun
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>protege-owl mailing list
>protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
>https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>
>Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>  
>




More information about the protege-owl mailing list