Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] re asoner doesn't react to intersection

Kaarel Kaljurand kaljurand at
Tue May 6 08:30:02 PDT 2008


On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:54 PM, bassiee <back_to_basic_69 at> wrote:
>  i have implemented following OWL-DL rule for a class called 'classA':
>  (∃ has_b B) ⊔ (∃ has_c C)

Do you mean that you asserted the following OWL axiom:

classA subClassOf (has_b some B) or (has_c some C)

>  When I make on object of classA, and I don't't create any resources.

Do you mean that you created an individual and asserted that it is of
class classA?
What do you mean by resources?

>  Then the reasoner doesn't react to it... The reasoner should notise that at
>  least one of bouth  shouls have a resource.

What do you mean by "notice"?
What do you mean by "one of both"?
What do you mean by "should have"?
What do you mean by "resource"?

>  I used pellet and racer pro.

How? DIG? Built-in? Command-line?

>  Is this normal?

I guess...


More information about the protege-owl mailing list