Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] OWL Lists and Reasoners
dcebrian at guest.uji.es
Fri May 30 03:25:32 PDT 2008
First of all, thank Tania for your reply!
Before the attempt of using OWLList I had already increased the heap size
due to the density of the ontology using the recommendations because some
time ago I had had some problems checking the consistency and I could solve
them setting the heap size.
Regarding to your question, I can see in the console window:
Protege 3.4 Build 130, JVM 1.6.0_05-b13, memory=1400M, Windows XP,
encoding=UTF-8, language=es, country=ES
I must explain that I am not using Build 500 because I'm working with some
SWRL rules and a database, and I've seen in the forum that I would have to
make some changes to adapt those and build 500 seems to have some bugs to
In other hand, I could check the consistency with the DIG Reasoner of
Protégé and Pellet 1.5.2 but I had some problems in relation to the version
of DIG (1.1):
WARNING CAUSE: hasValued min 1 (on Object)
Not able to convert datatype property cardinality restrictions to DIG (the
language used to communicate with the reasoner). Ignoring this restriction
and attempting to continue.
WARNING CAUSE: hasValued
DIG 1.1 (The language used to communicate with the reasoner) does not
support the range specified for the datatype property hasValued.
Ignoring this range on this property.
Is there any way of improving the version of DIG in Protégé?
Tania Tudorache wrote:
> After you have increased the heap size, did you restart Protege? The
> changes take effect only the next time you start Protege.
> You can also check the first line in the console window where Protege
> started, that should look like:
> Protege 3.4 Build 500, JVM 1.5.0_15-b04, memory=1200M, Linux,
> encoding=UTF-8, language=en, country=US
> What do you see as the value of memory?
> Did you check out the wiki page for setting the heap size? 
> : http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/index.php/Setting_Heap_Size
> David Cebrián wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm new in the field of ontologies and I'm trying to use OWLList to
>> describe a process in a product engineering ontology. I've made a simple
>> list of three elements with the Wizard of Protégé (v 3.4 b130).
>> Next, I've tried to check consistency with Pellet 1.5.1 but appears to
>> not have enough memory though I have the heap size memory in 1409715200.
>> Also I've been reading two posts about that ,  and a paper of
>> Drummond et al.  but since 2006 I haven't found more information about
>> I would like to know if it has been worked more recently in this aspect
>> and it is possible nowadays to use a reasoner in order to infer knowledge
>> when it is being used an OWL List and which reasoner would be better.
>> Thanks in advance!!
>> David Cebrián
>>  http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/acceptedLong/submission_12.pdf
>> protege-owl mailing list
>> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OWL-Lists-and-Reasoners-tp17530832p17555849.html
Sent from the Protege - OWL mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the protege-owl