Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Rules to modify/create ontologies from ontologies?
johann.petrak at chello.at
Thu Oct 2 02:14:52 PDT 2008
Since I got no answer yet I will broaden my question:
what ways exist to systematically change or merge
the knowledge in one or more ontologies into
a new ontology?
Is the only way to do this to hand-code it or
do tool or more formal, e.g. rule-based, approaches
I'd highly apreciate any feedback about this, even
if it is not a solution -- I'd also apreciate hearing
from people who face similar problems.
On 09/29/2008 04:24 PM, Johann Petrak wrote:
> I am wondering if there is some high-level, possibly rule-based
> way (as opposed to hacking it in Java or similar) to modify
> an ontology or create a new ontology from an existing one.
> Here is the background and motivation: I have a process that
> creates an ontology automatically and due to the sequential
> process and other factors, the created ontology has several
> problems that need to be fixed:
> - several individuals might turn out to be known to be different or equal
> - properties might need processing and get split up or merged into
> other properties, or data properties might need to get converted
> into one or more object properties filled with individuals that
> need to created or modified.
> - one or more individuals might need to get converted into
> individuals of a different class (representing a different
> abstraction layer).
> - etc.
> For all these actions that would modify the ontology or
> create a new one there exists a domain theory that could
> be represented in a rule language where the rule head
> matches conditions in the original ontology and the
> rule body is a sequence of operations on property values
> and on the target ontology.
> Does anyone know about a way to (at least partly) achieve
> this or about people who work on similar things?
> Are there others who want to solve this or similar problems?
> And as usual: are you aware of other forums, mailing lists
> or places on the internet were questions like this one
> can be discussed?
More information about the protege-owl